User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; ZTE N9120 Build/IMM76I) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/32.0.1700.99 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-4.yml
Chrome Mobile 32.0.1700.99Android 4.0.4Blink ZTEN9120smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 32.0Blink Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.029 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 32.0.1700.99closeAndroid 4.0.4ZTEN9120mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26703 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 32.0Blink Android 4.0ZTEN9120smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 32.0.1700closeAndroid 4.0.4ZTEN9120closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.17402 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 32.0.1700.99WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 32Blink Android 4.0.4ZTEN9120 Avidmobile:smartyescloseclose0.041 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0ZTEN9120Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.051 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:11 | by ThaDafinser