User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_5) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/29.0.1547.65 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-318.php
Chrome 29.0MacOSX 10.7unknown AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 29.0Blink MacOSX 10.7AppleMacintoshDesktop0.11601 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.65closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 29.0.1547.65closeOS X 10.7.5desktop-browsercloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 29.0Blink Mac 10.7desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.65closeOS X 10.7.5closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 29.0.1547closeMac OS X 10.7.5closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 29.0.1547.65closeOS X 10.7.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.10101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 29.0.1547.65WebKit 537.36Mac OS X 10.7.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.46205 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 29Blink OS X Lion 10.7desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.65closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 29.0.1547.76closeMac OS X 10.8.3Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:11 | by ThaDafinser