User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.2; de; TSB_CLOUD_COMPANION;TOSHIBA_AC_AND_AZ) AppleWebkit/533.1(KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-492.php
Android 4.0Android 2.2unknown ToshibaFolio 100Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.2ToshibaFolio 100Tabletyesyes0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebkit 533.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.2GenericAndroid 2.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.2ToshibaAC AND AZsmartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.2closeAndroid 2.2ToshibaFolio 100closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 533.1Android 2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.2closeAndroid 2.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.035 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:09 | by ThaDafinser