User agent detail

SAMSUNG-SGH-T408/1.0*MzUwODYxODI1MTUzNzEy UP/4.1.19k UP.Browser/4.1.19k-XXXX
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSGH-T408 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 Mobile Phoneyes0.037 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-SGH-T408 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.19kclose SamsungSGH-T408mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 SamsungSGH-T408smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 4.1.19close SamsungSGH-T408closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.19k Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 4.1 SamsungSGH-T408mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SamsungSGH-T408Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.03 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:09 | by ThaDafinser