User agent detail

MOZILLA40 (COMPATIBLE MSIE 50 SERIES6027 NOKIA6638
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia6638 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.034 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Edge 50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Internet Explorer 50close Nokia6638mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 50Trident Symbian OS Series 60 27Nokia6638smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 50closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close Nokia6638closeclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
MSIE close closecloseclosecloseclose0.042 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 50Trident Nokiacloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 50 Nokia6638mobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:09 | by ThaDafinser