User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98; Win 9x 4.90; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Internet Explorer 6.0Windows METrident desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 6.0Trident Win32 Windows DesktopDesktop0.027 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 6.0closeWindows 4.90desktop-browsercloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows MEdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows Meclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 6.0closeWindows ME closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows Me closecloseclosecloseclose0.06101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 6.0 Windows MEdesktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 6.0closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:09 | by ThaDafinser