User agent detail

MOT-M930/0C.20.7ER MIB/2.2.1 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaM930 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-M930 0C.20.7ERcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2.1close Motorolamobile-browseryescloseclose0.19402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
MotorolaM930smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close MotorolaM930closeclosecloseclose0.016 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
MIB 2.2.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2.1 Windows Mobile AsusM930mobile:smartyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close MotorolaFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:08 | by ThaDafinser