User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Mobile; ALCATELOneTouch4019X/SVN 02003G; rv:28.0) Gecko/28.0 Firefox/28.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-firefoxos.yaml
Firefox Mobile 28.0Firefox OS 1.3Gecko 28.0AlcatelOne Touch Fire Cmobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 28.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Firefox 28.0close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 28.0Gecko Firefox OS AlcatelOneTouch4019Xsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 28.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox Mobile 28.0closeFirefox OS 1.3AlcatelOne Touch 4019Xcloseclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 28.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 28.0Gecko 28.0 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox Mobile 28.0Gecko 28.0Firefox OS 1.3AlcatelOne Touch Fire Cmobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 28.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close MozillaFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:08 | by ThaDafinser