User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux mips; U; HbbTV/1.1.1 (; Sony; KDL40HX751; PKG1.920EUA; 2012;);; xx) Presto/2.10.250 Version/11.60
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/sony.yaml
Opera Devices 3.2 Presto 2.10.250SonyBravia HX751 Smart TVtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 11.60Presto 2.10Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.60closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 11.60closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 11.60Presto GNU/Linux SonyKDL40HX751tv0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 11.60closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1closeSony 2012SonyKDL40HX751closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 11.60closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.12801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 11.60Presto 2.10.250Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices 3.2Presto 2.10.250 SonyBravia HX751 Smart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.60closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:07 | by ThaDafinser