User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130330 Thunderbird/17.0.5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Thunderbird 17.0.5GNU/Linux desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Thunderbird 17.0Gecko 17.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.033 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Thunderbird 17.0.5closeLinux email-clientcloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Thunderbird 17.0 GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Thunderbird 17.0.5closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Thunderbird 17.0.5closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.20502 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 17.0Gecko 20130330Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Thunderbird 17.0.5Gecko 17.0Linux desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:07 | by ThaDafinser