User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; ZTE V956 Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/32.0.1700.72 Mobile Safari/537.36 OPR/19.0.1340.69518
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
ZTEV956 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 19.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.06501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 19.0.1340.69518closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 19.0.1340.69518closeAndroid 4.1.2ZTEV956mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mobile 19.0Blink Android 4.1ZTEV956smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 19.0.1340.69518closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 19.0.1340closeAndroid 4.1.2ZTEV956closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.11001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 19.0.1340.69518WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 19.0Blink Android 4.1.2ZTEV956mobile:smartyescloseclose0.042 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 19.0.1340.69518closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 19closeAndroid 4.1ZTEV956Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.05801 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:06 | by ThaDafinser