User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; ru-ru; W6500 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.30 ACHEETAHI/2100050090
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
CM Browser 0.0Android 4.2unknown PhilipsXeniumMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
CM Browser WebKit Android 4.2PhilipsXeniumMobile Phoneyesyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2PhilipsW6500mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2yes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.2.2closeAndroid 4.2.2PhilipsW6500closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.07201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.30Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.2.2PhilipsW6500mobile:smartyescloseclose0.027 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2PhilipsW6500Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.10701 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:06 | by ThaDafinser