User agent detail

J-PHONE/4.1/J-SA51_a/SNJSAA1000513 SA/0001JP Profile/MIDP-1.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0 Ext-Profile/JSCL-1.1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/carrier-softbank.yaml
SanyoJ-SA51mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
J-PHONE 4.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close SanyoJ-SA51mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SoftbankJ-SA51smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SanyoJ-SA51mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SoftBank Mobile J-SA51_acloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SoftbankJ-SA51Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:06 | by ThaDafinser