User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 6_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; Google Page Speed Insights) Version/6.0 Mobile/10A525 Safari/8536.25 GoogleBot/2.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-618.php
yesGoogle PageSpeed InsightsBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGoogle PageSpeed InsightsBot/Crawler0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS 6.0.1AppleiPhonemobile-browseryescloseclose0.18002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesGoogle PageSpeed InsightsSite Monitor0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesGoogleBotclose0 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 6.0closeiPhone OS 6.0.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.40004 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Googlebot 2.1WebKit 537.36iOS 6.0.1AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesGooglebotclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 6.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:06 | by ThaDafinser