User agent detail

Opera/9.26 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X; U; xx)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 9.26OS X desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 9.26Presto 2.0MacOSX 10AppleMacintoshDesktop0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.26closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.26closeOS X desktop-browsercloseclose0.23202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.26Presto Mac desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.26closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.26closeMac OS X closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 9.26closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.07901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 9.26 Mac OS X closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.39904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 9.26 OS X desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.26closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 9.26closeIntel Mac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:05 | by ThaDafinser