User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/AA5D
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-814.php
Firefox 41.0Win10 10.041.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 41.0Gecko 41.0Win10 10.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.032 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox AA5Dcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox AA5DcloseWindows 10.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox Gecko Windows 10desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox AA5DcloseWindows 10.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows 10 closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox closeWindows 10 closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox Gecko 20100101Windows Windows NT 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox Gecko 41.0Windows 10desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 77closeWindows 10Desktopcloseclose0.09601 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:05 | by ThaDafinser