User agent detail

Vodafone/1.0/SAMSUNG-SGH-J700V/AUHA3/1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UP.Browser/6.2.3.3.c.1.101 (GUI) MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-feature.yaml
Openwave 6.2 SamsungJ700mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 JAVA SamsungSGH-J700Mobile Phoneyes0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Vodafone 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.3.c.1.101close SamsungSGH-J700mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 SamsungSGH-J700Vsmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 6.2.3close SamsungSGH-J700Vcloseclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.3.c.1.101 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.2 SamsungJ700mobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SoftBank Mobile SAMSUNG-SGH-J700Vcloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SamsungSGH-J700Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:04 | by ThaDafinser