User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.3; zh-CN; Lenovo A390t Build/IML74K) AppleWebKit/534.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) UCBrowser/9.2.0.308 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.31
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-732.php
UC Browser 9.2Android 4.0unknown LenovoA390tMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.2U3 Android 4.0LenovoA390tMobile Phoneyesyes0.044 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser 9.2.0.308closeAndroid 4.0.3LenovoA390tmobile-browseryescloseclose0.25603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.2WebKit Android 4.0LenovoA390tsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.2.0closeAndroid 4.0.3LenovoA390tcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.08701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.2.0.308WebKit 534.31Android 4.0.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.2Webkit 534.31Android 4.0.3LenovoA390mobile:smartyescloseclose0.023 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:04 | by ThaDafinser