User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (PDA; Windows CE/1.0.1) NetFront/3.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/pda/generic.yaml
NetFront 3.0Windows CE pda Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 3.0NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 3.0closeWindows AccessNetFront Ver. 3.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19104 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 3.0NetFront Windows CE yes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 4.0closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.0closeWindows CE closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NetFront 3.0closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.08002 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetFront Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 3.0 Windows CE pdacloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile AccessNetFront Ver. 3.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.10701 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:04 | by ThaDafinser