User agent detail

Huawei/1.0/0MTC-752/B000 Browser/Obigo-Browser/Q05A MTC-752 HuaweiJava/1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-feature.yaml
Obigo Q 5A HuaweiJavamobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Huawei 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM 1.0HuaweiMTC 752mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19004 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo Huawei1smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo close HuaweiJavacloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesJavaCrawler0.06801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Browser closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40508 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 5A HuaweiJavamobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
emobile closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close HuaweiMTC 752Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:04 | by ThaDafinser