User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Java; U; en-us; lg-lg420g[tf012125009345399008080015075895332] obigo) UCBrowser8.3.0.154/70/352/UCWEB Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGlg420g Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGeneral CrawlersBot/Crawler0.08901 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.22405 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.3 LG420gsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.3.0close LGlg420gcloseclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08502 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Browser LGLGlg420gcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40908 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo LGlg420gmobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:04 | by ThaDafinser