User agent detail

FlixsteriOS/6.15 (iPad; CPU OS 7_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/537.51.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/11A465
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-539.php
Flixster App 6.15iOS 7.0unknown AppleiPadTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Flixster App 6.15WebKit iOS 7.0AppleiPadTabletyesyes0.033 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 537.51.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeiOS 7.0AppleiPadmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18804 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari WebKit iOS 7.0AppleiPadtabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeiOS 7.0closeiPadcloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari UIWebView 7.0closeiOS 7.0AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS 7.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.10102 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 537.51.1iOS 7.0AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.44909 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 537.51.1iOS 7.0AppleiPadtabletyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Webview closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.14802 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:03 | by ThaDafinser