User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; LG-D618 Build/KOT49I) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.59 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-563.php
Chrome 31.0Android 4.4unknown LGG2 mini Dual SimMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 31.0Blink Android 4.4LGG2 mini Dual SimMobile Phoneyesyes0.05101 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 31.0.1650.59closeAndroid 4.4.2LGD618mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25305 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 31.0Blink Android 4.4LGD618smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 31.0.1650closeAndroid 4.4.2LGD618closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.59WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2LGLGD618closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40108 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 31Blink Android 4.4.2LGG2 minimobile:smartyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4LGD618Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.05301 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:03 | by ThaDafinser