User agent detail

Mozilla/4.5 (compatible; HTTrack 3.0x; Windows 98)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-279.php
yesHTTrackOffline Browser Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesHTTrackOffline Browser0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
closeWindows 4.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.22405 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows 98desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 4.5closeWindows 98closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows 98 closeclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 4.5 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40308 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Windows 98desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:03 | by ThaDafinser