User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.1; CinemaTV 3G Build/JOP40D[20140121.165907]) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/42.0.2311.61 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Chrome 42.0Android 4.2unknown ExplayCinemaTV 3GTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 42.0Blink Android 4.2ExplayCinemaTV 3GTabletyesyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.61closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 42.0.2311.61closeAndroid 4.2.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.27706 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 42.0Blink Android 4.2tabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.61closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 42.0.2311closeAndroid 4.2.1CinemaTV 3Gcloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.06301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 42.0.2311.61WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40308 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 42Blink Android 4.2.1CinemaTV 3Gtabletyescloseclose0.079 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.61closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.03 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:03 | by ThaDafinser