User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SAMSUNG; SAMSUNG-GT-S8600-ORANGE/S8600BVKJ8; U; Bada/2.0; fr-fr) AppleWebKit/534.20 (KHTML, like Gecko) Dolfin/3.0 Mobile WVGA SMM-MMS/1.2.0 NexPlayer/3.0 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLDC-1.1 OPN-B
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-S8600-ORANGE Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dolfin 3.0WebKit Bada 2.0SamsungWave 3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 534.20closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Dolphin 3.0closeBada 2.0SamsungGT-S8600mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19604 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NexPlayer 3.0 Bada 2.0SamsungGT-S8600smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Dolfin 3.0closeBada 2.0SamsungGT-S8600-ORANGEcloseclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Dolfin 3.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08602 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
5.0WebKit 534.20 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40908 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Dolfin 3.0Webkit 534.20Bada 2.0SamsungWave 3mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Dolfin Browser 3.0closeBada 2.0SamsungGT-S8600Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:02 | by ThaDafinser