User agent detail

iBrowser/Mini2.5 (LG-T375)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-ibrowser.yaml
iBrowser Mini 2.5 LGT375mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
iBrowser 2.5WebKit Mobile Phoneyesyes0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
iBrowser Mini2.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IBrowse close desktop-browsercloseclose0.19104 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
IBrowse LGT375smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
iBrowser Mini 2.5close LGT375closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
LGLGT375closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42108 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
iBrowser Mini 2.5 LGT375mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:01 | by ThaDafinser