User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.4; en-us; HTC Glacier Build/GRJ22) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser/9.5.0.360 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-1.yml
UC Browser 9.5.0.360Android 2.3.4WebKit HTCGlaciersmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.5U3 Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.03401 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.4HTCGlaciermobile-browseryescloseclose0.27305 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.5WebKit Android 2.3HTCGlaciersmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.5.0closeAndroid 2.3.4HTCGlaciercloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.20804 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.5.0.360WebKit 533.1Android 2.3.4HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40808 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.5Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.4T-MobilemyTouch 4Gmobile:smartyescloseclose0.039 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 2.3Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:00 | by ThaDafinser