User agent detail

UCWEB20 (WINDOWS U WDS 710 EN-US NOKIA LUMIA 510) U2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
NokiaLUMIA Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.01901 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB20 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeWindows mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20304 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 20 Windows NokiaLUMIAsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close NokiaLUMIAcloseclosecloseclose0.02201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 20 NokiaLumiacloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.4941 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser Gecko NokiaLUMIA 510mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.13104 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:42:00 | by ThaDafinser