User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.47 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-436.php
yesFake ChromeBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake ChromeBot/Crawler0.04701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.47closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.47closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.20104 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 35.0Blink Windows 7desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.47closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 35.0.1916closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.47closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.05401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.47WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40608 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 35Blink Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.47closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 35.0.1849.0closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.01901 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:59 | by ThaDafinser