User agent detail

NANaverNDrive/3.0.0(Android OS 4.2.2;samsung SHV-E300S)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSHV-E300S Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesNaverBotBot/Crawler0.02801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
NANaverNDrive 3.0.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid SamsungGalaxy S4mobile-browseryescloseclose0.35507 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2SamsungSHV-E300Ssmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid SamsungSHV-E300Scloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android SamsungGalaxy S4mobile:smartyescloseclose0.028 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.05302 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:58 | by ThaDafinser