User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; VS TOUCHTAB 8DC Build/JRO03H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36 OPR/15.0.1162.60140
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
VersusTOUCHTAB 8DC Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 15.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 15.0.1162.60140closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 15.0.1162.60140closeAndroid 4.1.1GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.30606 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 15.0Blink Android 4.1yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 15.0.1162.60140closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 15.0.1162closeAndroid 4.1.1VersusTOUCHTAB 8DCcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.06201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 15.0.1162.60140WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40708 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 15.0Blink Android 4.1.1VersusTouchtab 8 Dual Coretabletyescloseclose0.031 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 15.0.1162.60140closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Tabletyesyescloseclose0.05702 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:57 | by ThaDafinser