User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; ARM Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/538.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/538.15 Version/6.0 Debian/7.8 (3.8.2.0-0rpi21rpi1) Epiphany/3.8.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-714.php
Epiphany 3.8Debian unknownunknown Raspberry Pi FoundationRaspberry PiDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Epiphany 3.8WebKit Debian Raspberry Pi FoundationRaspberry PiDesktop0.01801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Epiphany 3.8.2closeOS X desktop-browsercloseclose0.18604 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Epiphany 3.8WebKit Debian 7.8desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 6.0closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Epiphany 3.8.2closeDebian closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Epiphany 3.8.2closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.06201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Epiphany 3.8.2WebKit 538.15Mac OS X closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42208 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
GNOME Web 3.8.2Webkit 538.15OS X desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 6.0.5closeMac OS X 10.7.5Desktopcloseclose0.02301 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:57 | by ThaDafinser