User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; en-gb; KFTHWI Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Silk/3.19 Safari/535.19 Silk-Accelerated=true
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-325.php
Silk 3.19Android unknownunknown AmazonKindle Fire HDX 7Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Silk 3.19WebKit Android AmazonKindle Fire HDX 7Tabletyesyes0.18306 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Silk 3.19closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 535.19closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.26505 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Silk 3.19Blink Android AmazonKindle Fire HDX 7" WiFitabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Amazon Silk 3.19closeAndroid AmazonKindle Fire HDX 7" WiFicloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.11002 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Silk 3.19WebKit 535.19Fire OS AmazonKindlecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.46709 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Silk 3.19Webkit 535.19FireOS 3AmazonKindle Fire HDXtabletyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Amazon Silk Browser 3.1closeAndroid AmazonKFTHWITabletyesyescloseclose0.01801 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:57 | by ThaDafinser