User agent detail

Mobiistar Touch Kem 452 Linux/3.0.13 Android/4.0.4 Release/09.21.2012 Browser/AppleWebKit534.30 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Mobile Safari/534.30 Android 4.0.1;
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-android.yaml
Android Browser Android 4.0.4Webkit 534.30MobiistarTouch Kem 452mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.04401 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.30closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4MobiistarTouch Kem 452mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26905 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.0yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.0.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.0.1closeAndroid 4.0.4closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.06301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit Android 4.0.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40908 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.0.4MobiistarTouch Kem 452mobile:smartyescloseclose0.024 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.03801 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:57 | by ThaDafinser