User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; TM-4004 Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 YaBrowser/1.20.1364.172 Mobile Safari/537.22
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
TexetTM-4004 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Yandex Browser 1.20Blink Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.02601 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.172closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Yandex Browser 1.20.1364.172closeAndroid 4.0.4TM-4004mobile-browseryescloseclose0.30906 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Yandex Browser 1.20Blink Android 4.0yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Yandex 1.20.1364.172closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Yandex Browser 1.20.1364closeAndroid 4.0.4TexetTM-4004closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
ABrowse closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.21904 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Yandex Browser 1.20.1364.172WebKit 537.22Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43809 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Yandex Browser 1.20Webkit 537.22Android 4.0.4teXetTM-4004mobile:smartyescloseclose0.03 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.172closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.06902 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:57 | by ThaDafinser