User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (DTV; TSBNetTV/T33010302.0203.3DD; like Gecko) NetFront/3.4 DTVNetBrowser/2.2 (000039;T33010302;0203;3DD) InettvBrowser/2.2 (000039;T33010302;0203;3DD)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/toshiba.yaml
NetFront 3.4 ToshibaSmart TVtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 3.4NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.06002 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 3.4close GenericSmartTVmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18204 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 3.4NetFront Toshibatv0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.4close T33010302closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet TV Browser 2.2 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40508 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 3.4 ToshibaSmart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
InternetTVBrowser closecloseclosecloseapplianceclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:56 | by ThaDafinser