User agent detail

Opera/8.01 (Windows NT 5.1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-436.php
Opera 8.01WinXP 5.11.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 8.01Presto 1.0WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 8.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 8.01closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18704 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 8.01Presto Windows XPdesktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 8.01closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 8.1closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 8.01closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.05901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 8.1 Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40608 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 8.01 Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 8.01closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 8.52closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:55 | by ThaDafinser