User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; RC0743H Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/38.0.2125.114 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet.yml
Chrome 38.0.2125.114Android 4.2.2Blink 3QRC0743Htablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 38.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.02301 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.114closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.114closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.24505 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 38.0Blink Android 4.23QRC0743Htabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.114closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 38.0.2125closeAndroid 4.2.23QRC0743Hcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.09702 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.114WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.57211 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 38Blink Android 4.2.23QQoo! Q-Pad RC0743Htabletyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.114closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.03301 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:55 | by ThaDafinser