User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (BREW 3.1.5; U; en-us; Sanyo; Polaris/6.0/AMB) Sprint SCP-2700
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SprintSCP-2700 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Polaris 6.0closeJVM SanyoSCP2700mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18904 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Polaris 6.0 Brew 3.1SanyoZ710tfeature phoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 4.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Polaris 6.0closeBREW 3.1.5SprintSCP-2700closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 4.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42008 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Polaris 6.0 Brew 3.1.5mobile:featureyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SanyoSCP2700Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.03401 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:54 | by ThaDafinser