User agent detail

JUC (Linux; U; 4.0.4; zh-cn; iBuddyConnecta_3G; 480*768) UCWEB7.9.0.94/139/444
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
IntexiBuddy Connect a_3G Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 7.9WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
JUC closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27305 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.9 GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.9.0closeAndroid 4.0.4IntexiBuddy Connect a_3Gcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 7.9.0.94closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.9.0.94 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41508 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.9 Android 4.0.4iBuddyConnecta 3Gmobile:smartyescloseclose0.049 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:54 | by ThaDafinser