User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_9) AppleWebKit/537.46.5 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/7.0 Safari/537.46.5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-safari.yaml
Safari 7.0OS X Mavericks 10.9Webkit 537.46.5desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 7.0WebKit MacOSX 10.9AppleMacintoshDesktop0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 7.0closeOS X 10.9desktop-browsercloseclose0.18404 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 7.0WebKit Mac 10.9desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 7.0closeOS X 10.9closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 7.0closeMac OS X 10.9closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 7.0closeOS X 10.9closecloseclosecloseclose0.13103 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 7.0WebKit 537.46.5Mac OS X 10.9closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40508 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari 7.0Webkit 537.46.5OS X Mavericks 10.9desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 7.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 7.1closeMac OS X 10.9.0Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:54 | by ThaDafinser