User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/38.0.2125.122 UBrowser/4.0.4627.3 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-uc.yaml
UC Browser 4.0Windows VistaBlink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 38.0Blink WinVista 6.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.02001 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.122closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.122closeWindows 6.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.19204 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 38.0Blink Windows Vistadesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.122closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 38.0.2125closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.122closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.05801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.122WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41008 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 4.0Blink Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.122closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:54 | by ThaDafinser