User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/29.0.1547.32 Safari/537.36 OPR/16.0.1196.29 (Edition Next)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera Next 16.0Windows 7Blink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 16.0Blink Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.02001 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 16.0.1196.29closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 16.0.1196.29closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.19604 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Next 16.0Blink Windows 7desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 16.0.1196.29closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 16.0.1196closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 29.0.1547.32closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.05101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 16.0.1196.29WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40908 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Next 16.0Blink Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 16.0.1196.29closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 16.0.1196.45closeMac OS X 10.9.0Desktopcloseclose0.12404 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:53 | by ThaDafinser