User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; TR10CS1 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.122 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet.yml
Chrome 35.0.1916.122Android 4.2.2Blink ECSTR10CS1tablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.20206 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.122closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.122closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.24505 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.2ECSTR10CS1tabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.122closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 35.0.1916closeAndroid 4.2.2TR10CS1closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.09002 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.122WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42208 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 35Blink Android 4.2.2ECSTR10CS1tabletyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.122closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 35closeAndroid 4.2IntelECS TR10CS1Tabletyesyescloseclose0.04401 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:53 | by ThaDafinser