User agent detail

Mozilla/3.0 (compatible; NetPositive/2.2.1; BeOS)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
NetPositive 2.2.1BeOS desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Netscape 3.0Gecko Desktop0.03301 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
NetPositive 2.2.1closeBeOS desktop-browsercloseclose0.30006 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetPositive 2.2 BeOS desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
NetPositive 2.2.1closeBeOS closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
NetPositive 2.2.1closeBeOS closecloseclosecloseclose0.05601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 3.0 BeOS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.37808 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetPositive 2.2.1 BeOS desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Japan Radio CompanyWX330JFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.01601 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:53 | by ThaDafinser