User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; KDE; Debian GNU/Linux Jessie x86_64; rv:39.0) Gecko/39.0 Firefox/39.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Firefox 39.0Debian Gecko 39.0desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 39.0Gecko 39.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.05802 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 39.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 39.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.17903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 39.0Gecko Debian desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 39.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 39.0closeDebian closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 39.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 39.0Gecko 39.0Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42709 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 39.0Gecko 39.0Debian desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 39.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.02401 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:52 | by ThaDafinser