User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (X11; SunOS i86pc; U; xx) Presto/2.2.15 Version/10.11
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 10.11Solaris Presto 2.2.15desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 10.11Presto 2.2SunOS Desktop0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 10.11closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 10.11closeSolaris desktop-browsercloseclose0.19704 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 10.11Presto Solaris desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 10.11closeSunOS closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 10.11closeSolaris closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 10.11closeSunOS closecloseclosecloseclose0.07202 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 10.11Presto 2.2.15SunOS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41008 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 10.11Presto 2.2.15Solaris desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 10.11closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 10.00closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:51 | by ThaDafinser