User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Windows Phone; Opera Mini/7.6.8/35.6680; U; ru) Presto/2.8.119 Version/11.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Opera Mini 7.6WinPhone unknown2.2 unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 7.6Presto 2.2WinPhone Mobile Phoneyesyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 7.6.8closeWindows mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18104 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 7.6Presto Windows Phone yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 7.6.8closeWindows Phone closeWindows Phonecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 7.6.8closeWindows closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 7.6.8close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08602 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 7.6.8Presto 2.8.119Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.46209 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 7.6.8Presto 2.8.119Windows Phone mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:50 | by ThaDafinser