User agent detail

SAMSUNG-SGH-T749/T749UVIF3 SHP/VPP/R5 NetFront/3.5 SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-3.yml
NetFront 3.5 NetFront SamsungSGH-T749smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 3.5NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.03401 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-SGH-T749 T749UVIF3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 3.5closeJVM SamsungSGH-T749mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19104 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 3.5NetFront SamsungSGH-T749smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.5close SamsungSGH-T749closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NetFront 3.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetFront Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40708 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 3.5 SamsungSGH-T749mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
NetFront 3.5close SamsungSGH-T749Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:50 | by ThaDafinser